Counsel Daniel Riley makes this motion to the court for the following reasons:
1. This case is IRS related and Paul Barbadoro is known for his fierce defense of the IRS both as a Judge and a prosecutor. The defendant can not get a fair impartial ruling with Paul Barbadoro behind the bench is the defendant's belief.
2. Paul Barbadoro has a history of defending pedophiles while as a defense attorney, leading to the defendant's belief Paul Barbadoro is mentally incapable of being a fair impartial Jurist but instead biased for the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA because they have pedophile allegations They can bring to light if Barbadoro does not rule in their favor.
3. The defendant has reason to believe Paul Barbadoro is biased due to his record of always doing what the prosecutors tells him to do insteaded of weighing the facts and listening to the arguements of both sides.
Visit: Daniel J. Riley Legal Defense make a donation!
The MSM spin on the Judge's Recusal is that he is and has been a long time friend of Judge Steven McAuliffe, so apparently and suddenly there is now a conflict of interest. I wonder for how long Paul Barbadoro conveniently forgot that he is friends with McAuliffe, and if Danny Riley’s motion to recuse touched on a little something more sensitive in which may have influenced him to disqualify himself.