My theory was clear. Get a decent tan, and the bar exam will take care of itself.
Like most law students of my day, I took a bar review course in anticipation of the exam. I wasn't entirely clear why I needed this course, but everyone else was taking it and I didn't want to be at a disadvantage. It struck me at the time that I had just finished paying for three years of law school, and I should be prepared to ace the bar. Still, as Jim made clear, failing the bar exam would have sucked, and would not have well served my constant desire to eat.
The review course was useful, mostly for the outlines that enabled me to go back and revisit areas of law that didn't hold much interest in the first place. Still, I understood that I would be tested on the "fertile octogenarian rule," and saw no reason not to have a ready answer. I was sufficiently disciplined to study, and actually found that I had learned more in class than I imagined.
I was disturbed by this. These were good students, most better than me. My law school efforts were relatively lax, spending more time understanding than trying to get good grades. Yes, the two aren't mutually exclusive, but the latter took time away from more important endeavors, like earning enough money to buy the next day's meals.
The bar exam wasn't nearly as difficult as I was lead to believe. I don't attribute this to my learned ways or innate intelligence, but rather my lack of fear of the test. So much pressure is placed on the students, by their schools, their families and themselves, that they create a barrier to success. Even now, as Jim emphasizes the impact of failure on the future of inchoate lawyers, the stress becomes unbearable. As any Viagra afficionado knows, stress can affect even the best performer.
It's just one more test. Don't make it worse than it has to be.