Cryer balked at Brown's suggestion that he won his case because he's a Freemason. "There is no national or world organization of Masons," he said.
"How in the world are we going to have a conspiracy to take over the world?"
"All the Masons do is pass on values that I think Ed and Elaine would approve of, if not applaud, if they knew about it," he said.
Source Union Leader: "Louisiana lawyer beats tax charges; worries for Browns"
Special Note: "Freemasonry is, by definition, a fraternity that aims to promote Brotherly Love and Friendship among its members. It is a worldwide organization that draws together men from every country, race, religion, ethnicity, opinion, and background, and helps cultivate and promote better relationships and bonds of friendships among them."
The above quote was taken from askafreemason.org, Now my question to the reader is this, what is the price that one pays for unquestioned loyalty? Would you be willing to advance a strangers agenda without questioning their motives, knowing full well that their agenda may be to harm an innocent? Mind you, I am not a close-minded person; I realize there are potentially many masons that do not have ill intent; however how would a mason protect one’s self from vouching for their “brother” who may be considered a fellow craft member, when their brother’s intent is to cause harm to an innocent?
It is well known among studied people that there are a large majority of masons in the legal field, lawyers judges etc, many masons are also in positions of power, however if you are taking part in this “brotherly love” by advancing a fellow masons agenda, would you not need to question the motives of such an agenda prior to submitting to the compulsory cooperation?
Therein lies the hitch, the cooperation is compulsory masons are binded by oath to this “brotherly love”. Now when you have secret ways of identifying one another via special handshakes, hand-signs, or by using abstract questions and answers, special pins or insignia that represent your status it normally goes unseen to the untrained eye.
The untrained eye has been conditioned to just accept such things as part of the landscape or scenery, yet many of us are aware of Freemasons unquestioned loyalty to one another, their susceptibility to infiltration by morally unscrupulous persons, many of us are also aware that some people in the advanced levels of masonry have been corrupted to the core, and the consequences of such cooperation or “brotherly love”, can prove to be very harmful to innocent people whom are morally righteous.
The blatant cooperative abuses that happen within the fraternity of Freemasons is the main reason that people in the know will cry of conspiracy which is by definition: “an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.” So in summation the evil of masonry is the conspiracy of “brotherly love” when it’s intent is to advance an agenda that harms an innocent by defrauding someone who is not a mason. This evil that I speak of cannot be avoided, when someone takes an oath that binds them to such unquestionable cooperation. This is the problem that I recognize with Freemasonry.
-Casey Lee Cobb
P.S. The occult practice of Freemasonry in the court system is a conflict of interest, potentially treasonous, and very unscrupulous. It does not necessarily allow for a fair trial. Fortunately for Tom Cryer, the law was upheld in his case, yet many times people in the tax honesty movement are persecuted in the courts, and are unable to rely on “brotherly love” for the magistrate to uphold the law and allow for a fair trial.
I’m not implying that the Judge in Tom Cryer’s case is a freemason; I’m merely stating that the number of Freemasons that have infiltrated the US legal system, has reached epidemic proportions, This is one of the biggest reasons why justice does not always prevail when pitted against “Brotherly Love”.
Hypotheticals to consider:
[Freemason Judge & Prosecutor] = How can justice prevail?
by comparison to:
[Freemason Judge & Defendant.] = Will justice prevail?